Triple talaq verdict: From decoding the judgment to why it is just a small step; five stories you must read

Triple talaq verdict: From decoding the judgment to why it is just a small step; five stories you must read

Triple talaq verdict: From decoding the judgment to why it is just a small step; five stories you must read

The Triple Talaq practice was overturned by the Supreme Court in a landmark 3-2 ruling, most agreed that the practice was anti-Islamic and “arbitrary.”

The triple Talaq’s verdict saw three different trials of the five-member constitutional bank hearing a clutch of petitions from Muslim women vying for their validity.

The government has been well received by the government, political parties, activists and petitioners, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and described it as “historic” and said that it had granted equality of Muslim women.

Here are the five stories to read about Indian Express

1) Faizan Mustafa, Vice Chancellor of the University of Law in Hyderabad NALSAR, made a profound immersion in the 395-page ruling and explains the view of the Supreme Court of India JS Khehar, Justice Rohinton F Nariman and Justice Kurian Joseph.

“The problems in the case were so complicated that we have up to three trials.” India’s Supreme Court President JS Khehar drafted an opinion with which Justice S Abdul Nazeer agreed.The second review was written by Judge Kurian Joseph.

The third trial was written by Justice Rohinton F Nariman in his favor and Judge Uday T Lalit. Kurian The judge agreed with Judge Khehar on certain points and Judge Nariman on the others.

Understand the judgments and the reasons for different opinions. All opinions have clearly indicated that they simply deal with instant triple divorce and not other forms of divorce under Muslim personal law. ”

Talaq triple, triple Talaq verdict, triple law stories Talaq divorce, Muslim divorce law, Muslim women, triples Talaq Supreme Court verdict, Mumbai news, New Indian Express Muslim women show signs of victory after the sentence of the Supreme Court.

2) Pratap Bhanu Mehta, Vice Cancellor University of Ashoka, argues that the Supreme Court overturned the practice of divorce, but most did not respect constitutional values in relation to religious belief and practice.

“The Supreme Court has succeeded in hitting it.The only question was the reasons given by the Court to do this, and the consequences that this might have for the larger developments in the subject of personal rights.

To this extent, it must be said that the judicial decision is disappointing. This reflects the fact that India is not yet ready to fully embrace the promise of freedom and equality in its individual constitution; They can win in pieces and loose, hesitant and amélioreusement. ”

3) In a special The Indian Express, Arif Mohammad Khan, who resigned in 1986 the Rajiv Gandhi government from his position in the Shah Bano case, wrote that the triple trial Talaq not only change the lives of Muslim women despite weighty possibilities Fought and won this long and arduous battle, but inspire other Indian women who face discrimination at home or in the workplace.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *